Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rail Guns

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rail Guns

    Id doesn't state in the rules anywhere I can find but to em it seems that evading a railgun fired at close range is nigh on impossible due to the velocity of the rounds I'm thinking. What do you think?

    The only caveat to this might be that spinal mounted railguns could be evaded at close and medium range as they are fixed weapons and harder to bring to bear on an evading vessel, however some of the capital ships have turret mounted railguns which could track vessels and these i reckon could not be evaded unless when fired at close range but could be at medium range. Thoughts?

  • #2
    Depends on perspective I guess.

    They are not as fast-firing - is my impression - as PDCs, so I guess one could make an argument that it takes more time to fire, and even on a turret, the aiming will be somewhat more sluggish, considering the power involved.

    I guess, some experimental turret-mounted rail guns could have a rule similar to torpedoes fired at long range, but instead when fired at close range. I wouldn't make that a hard and fast rule for turret mounted rail guns though, but as a new and scary foe that is plot-related in some way, sure.
    "The heart of the gambler's fallacy is a misconception of the fairness of the laws of chance. The gambler feels that the fairness of the coin entitles him to expect that any deviation in one direction will soon be cancelled by a corresponding deviation in the other. Even the fairest of coins, however, given the limitations of its memory and moral sense, cannot be as fair as the gambler expects it to be. This fallacy is not unique to gamblers. ... This expectation can be justified only by the belief that a random process is self-correcting. Idioms such as "errors cancel each other out" reflect the image of an active self-correcting process. Some familiar processes in nature obey such laws: a deviation from a stable equilibrium produces a force that restores the equilibrium. The laws of chance, in contrast, do not work that way: deviations are not cancelled as sampling proceeds, they are merely diluted." Kahneman and Tversky (1971)

    Comment

    Working...
    X