Hey guys and gals,

I was looking at the average damage values for plasma torpedoes and I realized that there are exactly zero circumstances where they are useful. (For clarity, the way the rules read as far as I can interpret them, plasma torps reduce the torpedo damage by 1 die and reduce the hull rating of the target ship by 1 category against that specific torpedo attack.)

Because of the way they work, for ships 2d6 hull and larger they functionally do nothing different from normal torpedoes, dealing the same average damage. Damage and resistance are both reduced by 3.5 on average.

(I have a basic mathematical proof that shows that the damage from both normal and plasma torps is identical, but I can't remember how to use spoiler tags to shrink text and don't want to clutter everything.)

For ships smaller than 2d6 (i.e. 1d6, 1d3, 1), because torpedo damage is reduced by 3.5 damage on average whereas hull resistance is reduced by 1.5 (1d6->1d3), 1 (1d3->1), and 1 (1->0) on average respectively, the balance that held for larger hulls breaks and the plasma torpedoes are simply worse compared to normal torpedoes.

For targeted attacks, for all ship sizes plasma torps deal less damage than normal torps. (I also have a proof for this.)

Am I just reading the book wrong? Is there a typo that somehow resolves all of this? I really like the idea of plasma torpedoes but they serve literally no purpose as they currently exist.

I was looking at the average damage values for plasma torpedoes and I realized that there are exactly zero circumstances where they are useful. (For clarity, the way the rules read as far as I can interpret them, plasma torps reduce the torpedo damage by 1 die and reduce the hull rating of the target ship by 1 category against that specific torpedo attack.)

Because of the way they work, for ships 2d6 hull and larger they functionally do nothing different from normal torpedoes, dealing the same average damage. Damage and resistance are both reduced by 3.5 on average.

(I have a basic mathematical proof that shows that the damage from both normal and plasma torps is identical, but I can't remember how to use spoiler tags to shrink text and don't want to clutter everything.)

For ships smaller than 2d6 (i.e. 1d6, 1d3, 1), because torpedo damage is reduced by 3.5 damage on average whereas hull resistance is reduced by 1.5 (1d6->1d3), 1 (1d3->1), and 1 (1->0) on average respectively, the balance that held for larger hulls breaks and the plasma torpedoes are simply worse compared to normal torpedoes.

For targeted attacks, for all ship sizes plasma torps deal less damage than normal torps. (I also have a proof for this.)

Am I just reading the book wrong? Is there a typo that somehow resolves all of this? I really like the idea of plasma torpedoes but they serve literally no purpose as they currently exist.

## Comment